# Selling Issues to Top Management

*Dutton · Voice & Silence · Academy of Management Review · 1993 · Open access*

The genuine historical root of what later became known in the psychological safety literature as the 'calculus of voice': introduces issue selling, the process by which middle managers (people two or three levels below the CEO, with more resources than junior staff but less control than senior leadership) direct top management's scarce attention toward a concern, deliberately distinguished from selling a specific solution or project, since issues themselves are ambiguous and contested, and only become organisational 'problems' through someone's active claims-making rather than by simply existing as objective conditions. Synthesises three separate literatures into a single model: social problem theory (from sociology, on how issues get framed and legitimated), impression management theory (on the reputational risks of speaking up), and upward influence research (on what makes persuasion attempts targeting senior leadership succeed). The paper's most consequential move, and the direct ancestor of Detert and Burris's (2007) later 'expectancy-like calculus' framing that much of the voice literature still uses, is treating the decision to initiate issue selling in expectancy-valence terms: people raise an issue when they both value it enough and expect the attempt to succeed, a genuinely early, precise articulation of exactly the cost-benefit weighing later voice and silence research keeps rediscovering under different names. Identifies two distinct reputational risks a seller runs, independent of whether the issue itself gets resolved well: being personally associated with an issue seen as negative, inappropriate or fringe (illustrated directly with the era's female executives being reluctant to speak publicly on what were coded as 'women's issues,' for fear of the stigma attaching to both the topic and to themselves), and having the organisation's eventual response to the issue reflect badly on the seller regardless of the issue's own merits. Works through, in a series of seventeen testable propositions, how issue framing shapes whether it gets heard: whether a solution is attached (usually, but not always, helpful, since it can also foreclose collective problem-solving or simply take too long in fast-moving environments); whether the framing implies top management's own responsibility for the issue (a double-edged tactic, since it raises attention but risks the seller's credibility, as executives don't love being told a problem is theirs); the use of vivid, dramatic, emotionally engaging presentation over dry statistical reporting, provided it's still backed by credible evidence; how succinctly the issue is expressed, since simply-packaged issues cost top management less of its scarce attention to process; whether the seller bundles the issue with others (safety in numbers and a broader coalition, at the cost of diluted personal credit and lost succinctness) or brings in allies to sell it collectively rather than solo (protects the individual seller's reputation but dilutes their credit if it succeeds); and whether selling happens through public or private channels (public selling puts impression-management pressure on top management to look responsive, increasing the odds of being heard, but also puts the seller's own reputation more visibly on the line). Explicitly proposed as an agenda for future empirical research rather than a report of findings, but its core theoretical architecture, that voice is a calculated act weighing value against expected success, with real reputational stakes attached to both raising an issue and to how it's ultimately resolved, has proven durable enough to still be doing foundational work in the field three decades later.

- **This page:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/dutton-ashford-1993/
- **View the source paper:** http://sjbae.pbworks.com/w/file/fetch/58197850/dutton_ashford_1993.pdf
- **Interactive map:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/?mode=papers&node=dutton-ashford-1993

## Connected concepts (7)

- [Calculus of Voice](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/the-calculus-of-voice.md)
- [Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/van-dyne-ang-botero-2003.md) (paper)
- [Employee Voice and Silence](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/morrison-2014.md) (paper)
- [How We Respond](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/how-we-respond-matters.md)
- [Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/detert-burris-2007.md) (paper)
- [Barriers to PS](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/barriers-to-psychological-safety.md)
- [Psychological Bravery](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-bravery.md)