# Reflections: Voice and Silence in Workplace Conversations

*Edmondson · Voice & Silence, Team Learning · Journal of Change Management · 2021 · Open access*

Introduces the 'Productive Conversation Matrix', a 2x2 framework crossing voice/silence with productive/unproductive to yield four archetypes of conversational participation: withholding (unproductive silence — holding back relevant ideas or concerns out of perceived risk), disrupting (unproductive voice — off-topic remarks, belittling outbursts, or candid complaints vented to peers rather than to anyone positioned to act on them), contributing (productive voice — relevant ideas, questions, or dissent that genuinely advances the discussion), and processing (productive silence — genuine active listening and absorption of what's being said, distinct from disengagement). The paper's central corrective to the voice literature is that maximising voice isn't the goal: not all speaking up helps (disrupting can do more damage than staying quiet), and not all silence is a failure of courage (processing is a skill leaders should actively cultivate, not merely tolerate as the absence of a problem). Threads a single composite illustrative case — two senior law-firm partners, Frank and Joseph, whose meeting with junior colleagues yields nothing — through all four archetypes, showing how specific leader behaviours (shooting down one junior's idea, over-endorsing a senior colleague's, wandering off-topic about a golf trip) actively manufacture both withholding and disrupting without any single dramatic act of intimidation. Real-world cases anchor each failure mode: Reed Hastings's account (from No Rules Rules) of the Qwikster split, where multiple Netflix executives privately doubted the plan but stayed silent, each assuming 'Reed is always right' or that no one else was objecting, illustrates withholding most clearly, and the response Netflix eventually adopted, declaring it 'disloyal' to disagree internally and stay quiet about it. WeWork's Adam Neumann and Theranos's Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny Balwani supply examples of disrupting driven by leaders themselves, punishing dissent with rage or ultimatums. Boeing's 737 MAX whistleblower reports add a distinct and underexplored variant: employees who did speak candidly, but only to peers rather than to whoever could act, including a quality manager formally reprimanded for raising concerns in writing rather than face-to-face. Disney and Pixar's merger negotiation (via Bob Iger's account of a pros-and-cons whiteboard exercise initiated by Steve Jobs) and Amazon's narrative-memo meeting culture, which structurally builds in a silent group reading period before discussion, serve as positive counter-examples that deliberately design for both contributing and processing at once. Each quadrant comes with a practical table of leader behaviours: framing sessions as learning rather than evaluation, acknowledging one's own fallibility, and pairing advocacy with inquiry (drawing on Argyris's double-loop learning) to reduce withholding and disrupting; explicit norms, shared vocabulary, and dedicated silent-reading time to protect processing. Proposes a phased team-level change process — assess current patterns via observation, survey or interview; align the team on what to work on first; frame it explicitly as a learning experiment; build in a regular feedback loop — extending Ford and Ford's premise that change is produced within and by communication itself, so that improving how a team talks is itself the change intervention, not merely a precursor to one.

- **This page:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-besieux-2021/
- **View the source paper:** https://www.hbs.edu/ris/Publication%20Files/Reflections_%20Voice%20and%20Silence%20in%20Workplace%20Conversations_619d3fd0-ddbf-4519-ab21-86695f515624.pdf
- **Interactive map:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/?mode=papers&node=edmondson-besieux-2021

## Connected concepts (12)

- [Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-1999.md) (paper)
- [The Fearless Organization: Creating Psychological Safety in the Workplace for Learning, Innovation, and Growth](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-2018.md) (paper)
- [Calculus of Voice](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/the-calculus-of-voice.md)
- [Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/van-dyne-ang-botero-2003.md) (paper)
- [How We Respond](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/how-we-respond-matters.md)
- [Learning from Mistakes Is Easier Said Than Done: Group and Organizational Influences on the Detection and Correction of Human Error](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-1996.md) (paper)
- [Managing the Risk of Learning: Psychological Safety in Work Teams](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-2002.md) (paper)
- [Silenced by Fear: The Nature, Sources, and Consequences of Fear at Work](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/kish-gephart-detert-trevino-edmondson-2009.md) (paper)
- [What People Get Wrong About Psychological Safety](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-kerrissey-2025.md) (paper)
- [High & Low Context Communication](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/reading-the-air-high-and-low-context-communication-in-teams.md)
- [Making it Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/nembhard-edmondson-2006.md) (paper)
- [Barriers to PS](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/barriers-to-psychological-safety.md)