# Voice is Not Enough: Conceptualising Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child

*Lundy · Voice & Silence, Power & Equity, Culture & Context · British Educational Research Journal · 2007 · Paywalled*

The argument that having a voice is worth little without someone obliged to listen and something obliged to change. The target is the phrase pupil voice, treated as a convenient abbreviation that quietly loses most of what Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child requires: not just that a child capable of forming a view may express it freely in all matters affecting them, but that the view is given due weight. Four elements are proposed instead: Space, children must be given the opportunity to express a view; Voice, they must be facilitated to express it; Audience, the view must be listened to; Influence, it must be acted upon as appropriate. Space and voice overlap, audience and influence overlap, and the sequence loops, because once a child is told what became of their view the process starts again.

The evidence comes from an audit of children's rights in Northern Ireland for the Children's Commissioner: over 350 professionals and 1,064 schoolchildren across 27 schools, with more than 100 children interviewed away from school in case a classroom made disclosure unsafe. Not having a say in decisions about them was the single most important issue children raised, and over half of the 903 school-related submissions fell under that heading. The texture is familiar: an eleven year old saying children are scared of speaking their mind in case they get shouted at, a fourteen year old saying teachers' opinions always come first, an education welfare officer observing that a child who questions a teacher is called cheeky or emotionally difficult.

Three arguments travel well beyond schools. First, tokenism is not a lesser version of participation but can be worse than nothing: tokenistic school councils were found to have as much or more negative impact than no council at all, and the Committee on the Rights of the Child notes that appearing to listen is relatively unchallenging while giving views due weight requires real change. Second, a right of audience: an outcome can rarely be guaranteed, but who must receive a view can be prescribed, which is why minutes reaching a governing body matters more than the meeting existing. Third, consultation without feedback teaches people to stop, illustrated by marginalised young people who declined to take part at all, citing fatigue with consultations that had changed nothing.

Two cautions Lundy states and others drop. Article 12 is a right and not a duty, so a child may decline to express a view and that refusal is itself to be respected: safety to speak rather than obligation to speak. And the capacity qualifier is narrower than assumed: the right to express a view depends only on being able to form one, mature or not, while age and maturity bear on the weight given, not on whether the child may speak. She is candid that adults are the gatekeepers here, that they may hold a vested interest in not complying, and that a conservative reading of which matters affect a child can shut the right down before it starts.

- **This page:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/lundy-2007/
- **View the source paper:** https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01411920701657033
- **Interactive map:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/?mode=papers&node=lundy-2007

## Neighbours (12)

- [Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/hirschman-1970.md) (paper)
- [Language and Symbolic Power](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/bourdieu-1991.md) (paper)
- [Pedagogy of the Oppressed](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/freire-1970.md) (paper)
- [Employee Silence: Quiescence and Acquiescence as Responses to Perceived Injustice](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/pinder-harlos-2001.md) (paper)
- [Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice: Is the Door Really Open?](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/detert-burris-2007.md) (paper)
- [Organizational Silence: A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/morrison-milliken-2000.md) (paper)
- [Psychological Safety, Trust, and Learning in Organizations: A Group-level Lens](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/edmondson-2003.md) (paper)
- [PS in Education](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-safety-in-education-academia-and-teaching.md)
- [Types of Silence](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/types-of-silence.md)
- [PS Books for Children](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-safety-books-for-children.md)
- [PS in Teacher Meetings](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-safety-in-teacher-meetings.md)
- [Reflections Pt 4: A Rights-Based Approach](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/reflections-part-four.md)