# SAFETY™ Model

*Tom Geraghty · Models & Critique*

Examines Dan Radecki's S.A.F.E.T.Y.™ neuroscience-based model — Security, Autonomy, Fairness, Esteem, Trust, You — comparing it with Edmondson's canonical definition. Identifies where the model adds value and where the neuroscience framing may borrow epistemic authority it hasn't earned.

- **This page:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/the-s-a-f-e-t-y-model-neuroscience-needs-and-psychological-safety/
- **Read the full article on psychsafety.com:** https://psychsafety.com/the-s-a-f-e-t-y-model-neuroscience-needs-and-psychological-safety/
- **Interactive map:** https://explore.psychsafety.com/?node=safety-model

## Connected concepts (7)

- [Paper Collection: Power, Safety and Authority Gradients](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/paper-collection-on-power-safety-authority-gradients-and-more.md)
- [Psychological Safety in Healthcare](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-safety-in-healthcare.md)
- [Four Stages Critique](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/the-four-stages-of-psychological-safety.md)
- [PS Index Critique](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/the-psychological-safety-index-a-critical-look.md)
- [Psychological Safety: Checklists](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-safety-checklists.md)
- [The PS Framework](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/psychological-safety-framework.md)
- [The SANE Effect](https://explore.psychsafety.com/n/the-sane-effect.md)