Utility of PS
Examines the 'futility of utility' — why framing psychological safety in utilitarian terms is legitimate in some contexts but ultimately corrosive. Argues utilitarian logic can be used to exclude those who can't prove their worth, making rights conditional on usefulness.
Keep notes on this, flag it to come back to, and build your own map. Create a free account →
Neighbours (11)
- Core Principles
- When Feeling Safe Isn't Enough: Contextualizing Models of Safety and Learning in Teams
- Why Foster PS?
- Coping with Uncertainty: The Interaction of Psychological Safety and Authentic Leadership in their Effects on Defensive Decision Making
- PS is Not the Goal
- Slacking Off in Comfort: A Dual-Pathway Model for Psychological Safety Climate
- Why Create PS?
- Culture vs Business Performance
- Reflections Pt 4: A Rights-Based Approach
- We Don't Need PS
- Work Doesn't Have to Suck