Normal Accidents
Summarises Charles Perrow's Normal Accident Theory: that in tightly coupled, complex systems, accidents are a near-inevitable systemic output, not a human failure. Shows how measures intended to improve resilience can inadvertently increase complexity — and therefore risk.
Keep notes on this, flag it to come back to, and build your own map. Create a free account →
Neighbours (16)
- Normal Accidents: Living with High-Risk Technologies
- Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness
- Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem
- The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA
- Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of "High-Reliability Organizations"
- Normalisation of Deviance (Challenger)
- Why Hospitals Don't Learn from Failures: Organizational and Psychological Dynamics That Inhibit System Change
- Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks
- The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster
- The Cost of Silence: Normalization of Deviance and Groupthink
- Dr Richard Cook
- Human Error & PS
- Resilience Engineering
- Safety I & Safety II
- Swiss Cheese Model
- Safety Organised Criticality