Safety I & Safety II
Explains Hollnagel's Safety I (prevent failure) vs Safety II (ensure success) distinction, and why both are needed. Connects to WAI/WAD and Dekker and Allspaw's corrective: things go right for the same basic reasons things go wrong — through people adapting.
Keep notes on this, flag it to come back to, and build your own map. Create a free account →
Neighbours (20)
- Organizing for High Reliability: Processes of Collective Mindfulness
- Risk Management in a Dynamic Society: A Modelling Problem
- Working in Practice But Not in Theory: Theoretical Challenges of "High-Reliability Organizations"
- From Safety-I to Safety-II: A White Paper
- From Titanic to Costa Concordia — a Century of Lessons Not Learned
- Collective Mind in Organizations: Heedful Interrelating on Flight Decks
- HOP
- The Collapse of Sensemaking in Organizations: The Mann Gulch Disaster
- A Tale of Two Safeties
- Amagasaki Disaster
- Building and Revising Adaptive Capacity Sharing for Technical Incident Response: A Case of Resilience Engineering
- Civility Saves Lives
- Dr Richard Cook
- Normal Accidents
- PS in Aviation
- Resilience Engineering
- Resilience is a Verb
- Safety Work vs Safety of Work
- Swiss Cheese Model
- WAI vs WAD