PS, Inclusion & Politics
Argues psychological safety and inclusion are inseparable — a team is only as safe as the least safe person, and those least safe are disproportionately those already marginalised. Uses the Paradox of Tolerance and the Basecamp case to examine the political limits of PS rhetoric.
Keep notes on this, flag it to come back to, and build your own map. Create a free account →
Neighbours (19)
- Hierarchies, Jobs, Bodies: A Theory of Gendered Organizations
- PS is Political
- Collective Responsibility
- Exploring the Relationship between Team Diversity, Psychological Safety and Team Performance: Evidence from Pharmaceutical Drug Development
- Least Safe Person
- Making it Safe: The Effects of Leader Inclusiveness and Professional Status on Psychological Safety and Improvement Efforts in Health Care Teams
- Not Same for Everyone
- Status Characteristics and Social Interaction
- Why Status Matters for Inequality
- Diversity & Performance
- Not Feeling Seen
- PS & Belonging
- PS in Diverse Groups
- PS in Education
- PS Should Support DEI
- Psychological Bravery
- PS in Remote Teams
- Startups & Inclusion
- Pac-Man Rule